Thursday, July 2, 2009

Grate Writing Made Eazee



One of the great things about being named what I was is that although there aren't that many Bowmans in the word, my name is still relatively common. Anyone trying to look me up on the internet is likely to find more famous people that have my name instead of finding me. (This is an advantage that Kara Wild doesn't have. The man who is currently known as The Angst Guy, however, has it even sweeter than I do.)

For example, you might find the conservative commentator, or the countertenor, or the head of the non-profit office instead of me. Which makes me wonder why I was named after my father, because the odds are great that neither of us would have become famous enough to need ordinal numerals to tell us apart. We wouldn't have even gotten a lousy "pere" or a "fils".

I'm currently busy writing part-time for a sports website. The great thing about it is that I get to go to games and mingle with the players, and I get to go to these games free to boot. It's a pain in the ass trying to arrange my work life and my sports life, but I've been enjoying it so far.

However, the old mental illness can play tricks on you. (A friend of mine, Rebecca, has a livejournal tag for this problem: "STFU brain".) I recently got a letter from the editor of the website saying, "I'd like to ask you some questions about the article you last posted."

One of my problems is catastrophization. It's part of what they call a cognitive disorder, or what they used to call "stinkin' thinkin'" in the old days. Briefly, it is the belief that all outcomes will be the worst possible ones. Therefore, I attempted to ameliorate the problem - if there was one - before it even presented itself as one. I sent the editor a 17MB .wav file which consisted of my interview. I suspect she's going to love listening to that thing, but hey, it's my anxiety that you're dealing with here.

That isn't the point of the post. The point of the post is that writing fanfiction does not prepare you for a life of journalism. It doesn't even prepare you for a life of pseudo-journalism. In fact, writing fanfiction could get about as close to not preparing you for a professional writing career as you can get while the volume of the words you produce on electric paper increases.

The first problem with fanfiction is that it is very easy to post a first draft as a completed work. I'm sure that guys like The Angst Guy sharpen and resharpen their work. Brother Grimace asks for betareading help - I know because he sends his stuff to me and I try to point out parts that are unclear, or gramatical errors, or the like. I generally don't use a beta-reader, and there's a reason. It's not that I think that my work is so great that it can't be improved; rather, it's that once I get through the painful process of putting words on paper I want the thing to be over and done with.

I think the only work for which I had multiple beta-readers was "Reclamation" and god-damn was it a painful process to have to sit and wait for the editing to get done. "What's wrong with you people? I sent it five minutes ago! Can't I have it back now?" (Whenever I get something to beta-read, I try to remember to send back a message that says, "Hey, I got this, but I can't beta-read it right away. I just wanted you to know that your story wasn't eaten by gremlins.")

However, writing pretend-journalism forces you to adopt new, unfamiliar, and painful ways of life. The first of these is to get used to having your work read by someone else, all the time. Why? Because when it is posted, it will be read by several someone elses, and if you suck as a writer, it means that the organization that is editing you sucks - they were the ones that posted your signed confession of literary incompetence on the web for all to see.

The second is that you must deal with maximum article length. With fanfiction, you can write a never-ending story. (See: Legion of Lawndale Heroes, The.) When writing for "press" you have to write something more than 450 words and less than 800. This forces me to do two things that I don't like doing:

a) getting to the point, and
b) shutting up when I'm done.

This is why people like fanfiction - because it lets you ramble on at will to a (mostly) uncritical audience. (Hell, you're doing the audience a favor for writing about their favorite characters!) In writing for press, the reader is doing you a favor - "interest me now, or I'm going to do crossword puzzles."

(People who write fanfiction tend to start blogs. It lets them indulge in their favorite activity, rambling incessantly about nothing.)

The third is the awful deadline. You can't just finish when you want to finish. You can't wait months between story segments. You can't write an unfinished story. I have to have my articles in within 24 hours of game on weekdays, and within 12 hours on weekends. If you think this is an unreasonable deadline, let me put it this way - I'm just pretending to be press and I receive no pay. The real journalists out there have to go to press the same day and they have to get their work in before the paper goes to press. This means that they're writing the story while they watch the game, sometimes before the game is even over. And if the game goes to overtime, they are doubly screwed, because they might have a grand total of five minutes to rework an article to reflect a different outcome before the paper goes to press. They are getting paid not so much for their literary excellence as they are getting paid to write a workable article within unreasonable time constraints.

Has this made me a better writer? I don't know. I look at my press work and it seems stilted, like my style has been shoved into a straitjacket. My wife says that it's "dry - just details". I'm trying to get more quotes, more human interest, but editors aren't like beta-readers. A beta-reader wants to help you get better; an editor just wants to fix the errors. An editor can improve an article on his own but likely won't have the time or inclination to help you improve it in the future.

In short, all that time I spent writing fanfiction did not help me that much. Although I can definitely say that writing fanfiction made me more comfortable with writing in general, and taught me a few tricks to avoid writer's block. Maybe that's all you need to be a good writer, or at least, to walk the path.

3 comments:

E. A. Smith said...

I have to confess that I also have a real problem with revising my work. Of all of my fics, only "So Long as Men Can Breathe" was officially submitted for beta-reading. Of the others, "The Tempest" was sorta-beta-read by Kara, and one bit in "Good Intentions" was revised on the fly due to negative reader reaction. The Love's Labours Trilogy and "Seven Days", on the other hand, had no beta-ing at all (and since the Trilogy was originally posted to fanfiction,net, I had absolutely no reactions to them until they were posted). I know that all the works that had some revision came out better for it, and it makes me wonder how a little more work might have improved the others.

Oddly enough, the exact opposite seems to happen to me on my non-fanfic work. My novel has gone through several revisions, some of them quite major, and I'm still not happy with it. The screenplay I'm writing with my best friend shifts radically every time we get together to work on it. There has to be some sweet balance between revision and just declaring a work done, but I'm still searching for what that is.

magickal_realism said...

Revision is very much a key in professional or semi-professional writing. While I disagree with your assessment that blogging is fake journalism - I consider it Revolutionary War journalism gone digital in many ways - I think I understand where you're coming from on this one.

I'm going to be presumptuous and leave a few suggestions for you:
1. If it's at all possible, write your concluding paragraph first. It might not be. It's not like you know the outcome of a game, but in situations where you can, do it.
2. Use metaphor and simile. Be a total goofball. Compare the ball to a summer's day, that tall guy sweating a thunderstorm over his opponent. It's blogging - it's allowed.
3. Quote stuffing is a valid practice. When I was doing the journalism thing I did it all the time.

The good thing about blog posts? Usually it's OK to revise them even after they've posted, providing you don't alter any facts for your bookie.

Cheers!


Di

The Angst Guy said...

The following has come up in my posts before, so I apologize in advance for the repetition.

The biggest, sweetest thing about the Internet, to me as an author, is the unlimited opportunity I have to revise and improve a story after it has already been "published" for the entire planet to see. I reread my old works at times, add corrections, and repost the new versions, usually with the current date added at the bottom of the revisions.

I have my own website for hosting my own stuff, so I can just e-mail links to everyone and not worry about sending in revisions to the point of driving webmasters insane. (Sorry, Kara.) Now I can spruce up my work however l like. (Thanks, Kara.) I don't believe that many writers take as much advantage of this benefit as I do. The Internet allows for enormous creativity and the constant chance for improvement. It beats the crap out of print in that regard.